Technical criteria of central venous catheters: Anaesthesiologist/intensivist and pharmacist opinions
Résumé
INTRODUCTION: The lack of technical information from suppliers and from the literature, a wide variety of features and the absence of medical device reference document explain the difficulty for medical and pharmaceutical staffs to choose a central venous catheter (CVC). The aim of this study was to establish the specifications to choose a CVC according to the clinician needs. METHODS: An analysis of suppliers' technical documentation and a literature review was performed to identify criteria and to collect them in a questionnaire to conduct semi-structured interviews between 1 pharmacist and 5 anaesthesiologists/intensivists. With these interviews, the technical criteria were classified according to their importance in 3 levels. RESULTS: Thirteen technical criteria were identified after reading the technical documents and the literature. Among them, 8 were classified as "essential criteria" (level I) by the physicians: J-shaped guide, one clamp on each way, identified lumen, radiopacity, graduation every centimeter by 5 to 20 cm from the distal extremity, a length of 15 to 25 cm, a single-lumen catheter with a 14 to 16G way and a three-lumen catheter with 14 to 18G way. Finally, three criteria were classified as "intermediate criteria" (level II) and two as "optional criteria" (level III). CONCLUSIONS: This collaborative approach allowed to reference new medical devices according to the clinicians needs. These CVC are a mean to respect guidelines for physicians and nurses and to secure the patient's care.
Mots clés
Critères
Criteria
Equipment Design
Humans
Pharmacie clinique
Pharmacists
Physicians
Specifications
Surveys and Questionnaires
Anaesthesia and intensive care
Anesthésie-réanimation
Anesthesiologists
Cahier des charges
Cathéter veineux centraux
Catheterization
Central Venous
Central venous catheter
Central Venous Catheters
Clinical pharmacy